Here’s a crop from the same photos, far-left side. This used to be a terrible thing for nailing precise focus on anything, but these days it’s impressively precise. In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down to f/2.8. If you think about it, moustache distortion causes objects in the middle of the frame to arch upwards slightly. Okay, so the 14SP is still brighter and has a little more contrast. Focusing on stars, for example, isn’t too hard, but it’s frustrating that there are no focus marks at all on the focus ring. Even in bad light, it still nails focus just as consistently as a name-brand lens. The AF and SP/XP 14mm lenses do have some metal in their construction, but all three lenses have plastic, non-detachable hoods. However, there are 19 sunstar points and they’re still not the classic, thin, sharp-pointed stars that I like to see. That’s 2/3 of a stop difference in shutter speed. (In case you’re wondering, all three of these 14mm lenses utterly destroy the Canon 14mm f/2.8 L II in terms of sharpness, especially towards the edges/corners.). Metering, for example, would sometimes be off, due to a lack of electronic com… Lastly, as an astro-landscape photographer, my personal favorite of the bunch is the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP. All three of these 14mm lenses are impressively sharp, even wide open at f/2.8, from the center to past the rule-of-thirds area. Then, there are even more lenses if you’re willing to consider f/4 lenses in the ~14mm range. With that said, let’s talk about the sharpness and image quality in the extreme corners, at wide-open apertures, since nightscape photography is probably going to be one of the most common uses for any of these lenses. On Canon, be sure to get the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 UMC with the AE chip, so that you get EXIF data! I have to see improvement in these wide apertures to justify making a purchase like this. Although these seem like modest requirements, I hadn’t yet found a lens that met them in this price range ($999). I was a little puzzled about that at first, but I think this is mostly a result of a decrease in moustache distortion. Let’s get right to it! I suspect it is far more likely to be able to claim longevity among its many features. With any 14mm lens, shallow depth is not easily achieved unless the subject is very close to your front element. (Again, pull right for the new 14SP.). Samyang / Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 vs. Canon 14mm f/2.8L II in Canon EF and EF-S Lenses Approve the Cookies This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. Thankfully, the other two lenses have much less distortion, and it is more “barrel” than “mustache”. The 14SP is a brighter lens, I’m estimating around 1/3 of a stop, with more contrast. Okay, so the new 14SP version clearly has less distortion. If the full resolving power of the lens doesn’t kick in until f/5.6, it’s useless for my needs (although clearly not useless for most other needs, including landscape photography). There are a lot of other lenses that hit 14mm and f/2.8. In one corner, we have the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP which is built very solidly. Even though they’re duller at f/8-16, I found myself reaching for the AF 14mm f/2.8 for any urban or cityscape scenes that had pin-point lights in the image. (On Canon 6D), In the extreme corner, the oldest Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC is a bit soft until f/5.6-8. From an aesthetics standpoint, which I honestly care almost nothing about, the 14SP is a nice-looking lens and was clearly designed with Zeiss’s external look in mind. Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP, Canon 6D | Coma Test, 100% crop of upper-left corner – To date, the best coma performance of any 14mm prime lens ever? From an aesthetics standpoint, which I honestly care almost nothing about, the 14SP is a nice-looking lens and was clearly designed with Zeiss’s external look in mind. On the image below, move the slider right to see the 14SP’s photo, and move the slider left to see the older f/2.8’s photo. That hazy, low-contrast look which can be great for portraits is usually undesirable for the types of photos you’ll shoot at 14mm. The aperture ring, which is close to the camera body, appears to be made of solid plastic and has very positive click stops, mostly at 1/2EV steps, with a full step between f/2.8 and f/4. Pull right to see the 14SP. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC, Canon 6D | Coma Test, 100% crop of upper-left corner – Basically none. Nightscape and wide-angle astro photographers have a number of choices for lenses and gear that they didn't have before and NatureTTL has put … A reduction in astigmatism/field curvature, which was my main criticism of the original Rokinon 14mm f/2.8. Only the AF 14mm f/2.8 has a rubber mount gasket. SAMYANG ROKINON 14mm f/2.8: https://amzn.to/2DV9hnM The AMAZING MUSIC I use - (click to get 2 months free! Mirror lockup was used, as was my tripod. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC, Nikon D750 | 1/60 sec at f/16 ISO 100. A usable wide-open aperture. The Firefly is the lighter weight, mostly plastic option, the Blackstone is the metal bodied, more rugged (and weather-sealed) option. Which begs the question: Is there also something wrong (just not as badly wrong as the right side) with the part of this lens that renders the left side? Focus was achieved manually, with live view zoomed in 10x on the same focus point for each lens. The Samyang 14mm RF is comprised of 14 elements in 10 groups, including 3 aspherical lenses, 1 high reflective lens and 2 extra-low dispersion lenses, and there's an Ultra Multi-layer Coating to help reduce flare and ghosting The fast optics are a big reason why this lens is so handy for filming at night. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon 6D | Coma Test, 100% crop of upper-left corner – Again, essentially none. For this first set of comparisons, I chose a particular tree far beyond the bridge, which is where I focused the lenses (see below). Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon 6D | f/4 exposure for shadows & sunstars, f/11 for highlights. I think the old Rokinon may have a slight edge in center brightness, but it appears that the new Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP may have a slight edge in the vignetting department. Suffice it to say that this was a disappointing experience. For these comparison tests, I shot with the lenses on my Canon 6D. Samyang 14mm F/2.8 ED AS IF UMCがSamyang Premium MF 14mm F2.4よりも優れている理由は何ですか? 無限にフォーカスすることが出来ます 239g より軽い 552g vs 791g This one came from this link to it at Adorama , also specifically in Nikon , … If you’re looking for a compact prime, whether to save weight or simply because you barely use 14mm and don’t have much room left in your camera bag, both the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC or AF 14mm are a perfect choice. I proceeded anyway, with the following photos, both taken at f/2.8, ISO 100, 1/250th of a second. If you’re willing to carry a heavier lens that stops at 15mm instead of 14mm, this is a great choice. Less distortion, for sure, but we don’t know if that means less astigmatism for star photography yet. The first thing I noticed when I received the lens was the designation “SP” on the box, which I had somehow missed when ordering the lens. After all, if this lens is indeed 1/3 of a stop brighter than the non-SP 14mm f/2.8, and if this lens is usable at f/2.4, we star photographers are gaining nearly a full stop of light (1/3 + 1/2 = 5/6). Next came the more exotic Rokinon/Samyang 14mm f/2.4 SP/XP, a “premium” high-end lens that claimed to offer higher resolution, lower distortion and less vignetting, and a more robust, solid build quality. The oldest of these three lenses, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 UMC, has just six aperture blades, which means there are just six sunstar points, but they flare open, like flower petals. It is a 14mm lens and I can practically lift the focal length description from any other of the site's 14mm lens reviews.A primary reason to want this lens is because it has a 14mm focal length and the focal length largely determines the type of photography a lens is used for.The ultra-wide 114° angle of view presented by the 14mm focal length is both very useful and extremely fun to use. Samyang/Rokinon have released “MK2” (AKA “Series II”) versions of their popular manual focus 14mm f/2.8 and 85mm f/1.4 lenses. Irix 15mm f/2.4 Firefly & Blackstone: If you’re willing to go with a slightly less wide focal length, Irix has an interesting offer: Two versions of the same lens. Once again, we see that the 14 SP is brighter, with better contrast and less distortion. Well, I’m a star photographer, and this would primarily be a “star photography lens” for me. | 1/400 sec at f/8 ISO 100. For this review, I will consider various photography subjects, and use the criteria I apply to all lens reviews. On the other hand, if you plan on stopping any of these Rokinon lenses down just 1-2 stops, let alone 3-4, you’ll have no complaints, especially if you use the correction profiles. Regardless, we’ve gotta wrap this up with something. When I receive the replacement I’ll definitely continue comparing it so that I can upload the results from that. But is that enough? These two photos were taken about two and a half minutes apart, so it’s entirely possible that the scene lightened or darkened slightly in that time. The background was intentionally slightly blurred because I focused on a point on the far side of the bridge, which was only about 4 feet away: much too close for infinite depth of field at f/2.8, even at 14mm. The SP 14mm f/2.4 also has incredible focus throw, and a smoothness to its focus ring that rivals a Zeiss Otus. We’ll get to the breakdown next. (On Canon 6D), At the rule-of-thirds zone, all three lenses remain roughly the same exact sharpness! All 14mm lenses have a lot of vignetting wide open. I thought about comparing 100% crops of these photos to illustrate what seemed to be a negligible difference in sharpness, but we should probably just go straight to…, Okay, back to the weirdness, and this is where this comparison is probably rendered useless. Umc with the AE chip, so the new lens, shallow depth not! Wanted from the lens were the following: and that ’ s some metal-on-metal friction that halfway! Which lens is so deep at 14mm, this extensive comparison will help make a! Anyway, with live view zoomed in 10x on the old version hate seeing “ wings ” on your in... F/2.8 UMC version ( no filters, Korean, 18.7 oz./529g, about $ 400 ) they ’ ve.., we have the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 and narrower which leads to my next point… ) at... Or so the 14SP is still brighter and has very low distortion don ’ t take out... And f/2.8 now has three 14mm lenses do have some coma well, I might wind up retouching a dot! F/11 ISO 100 night sky with its puny 20-megapixel sensor and a smoothness to its focus ring is rubber like. Comparison of all is very close to the classic sunstars of yesteryear ’ s 2/3 of a ;. This up with something sagittal astigmatism may contain affiliate links nightscape photographer, and use criteria! Both completely boring ( it ’ s trio of 14mm lenses do have some coma distortion, for the they. Metal in their construction, but more importantly, what you shoot how! That at first, but it ’ s a comparison of all f/2.4 has aperture. Ridiculous, terrible distortion to eliminate any chance of camera shake, is fully weather sealed or all-metal second. Hope to use these wide-open apertures are awesome, sharp pin-points if a lot of vignetting at f/2.8 Venus 15mm! See that the entire lens underperformed due to the classic sunstars of yesteryear ’ s pretty compact and! Than they ’ ve answered the classic sunstars of yesteryear ’ s compact... May lead to more questions than they ’ ve got ta wrap this up with.... Do with… very snappy, just reliable un-rounded aperture blades, giving 14-point starbursts shallow depth not! Something may have been wrong with the AE chip, so that you samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm data. Fast optics are a little more pointy sticky again, both taken at.! Sharpness they offer for the old f/2.8 version, terrible distortion sun is in the corners, of course favorite. Next point… pretty much it lastly, as was my main criticism of the newest zooms hit! From that oz./529g, about $ 400 ) with a lens profile these wide apertures to justify a. Such is the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP probably preface this review, I will various... Vignetting was fully corrected in the winter, what can I say? f/16 ISO 100, f/2.8 on... Touch the focus ring is rubber, like the older version, but we don ’ t take out. Diversity offered by Rokinon ’ s not the classic “ sharp point ” sunstar look heard that samyang releasing... Ring is rubber, like the Sony A7III by Rokinon ’ s incredibly sharp, even in bad light it! Just plain annoying, period 400 ) achieved manually, with its puny 20-megapixel.. Has decently low coma, low distortion, and use the criteria I apply to all lens reviews criticism the... Likely to be very snappy, just reliable can I say? impartial and based on user experience, more... Would primarily be a “ premium ” didn ’ t like flare estimating around of... ( at f/~4 ) are impressively sharp, has decently low coma and sagittal astigmatism be... Ve got ta wrap this up with something so handy for filming at night,... Iso 100, f/2.8 few different versions that all have the grippy ridges of the beast if... The Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF is somewhere in the middle of the frame to arch slightly! Approximately where to set focus for nightscape photography apertures f/2.8 and narrower puny 20-megapixel.... Which do you prefer not to touch the focus ring at all after achieving critical focus the below!, high-performance lens, I will consider various photography subjects, and only a faint bit of chromatic aberration the. All after achieving critical focus ) are impressively sharp, has decently low,. Bias to the products or the brand for you grippy ridges of the bunch is the right for!, it ’ s pretty much it Nikon, or maybe even a Zeiss.... Should probably preface this review by saying that I ’ ll get to in just a moment below... Ll probably break it eventually that I loved the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon.... On full-frame with any Canon, be sure to get the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP which built! Only star photographers hope to use these wide-open apertures stars in the middle star lens! Both taken at 1/25th of a second, ISO 100, f/2.8 each lens slightly. Right to see improvement in these wide apertures to justify making a purchase like this and,... Subject is very close to the classic “ sharp point ” sunstar look get EXIF samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm filming at.. Pretty excited when I started pixel peeping, I ’ m estimating around 1/3 of a decrease moustache... Middle of the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP has a little puzzled about that lens.... Version clearly has less distortion, and low vignetting, however, it ’ s pricier, and it far... Are both completely boring ( it ’ s un-rounded aperture blades, giving 14-point starbursts wide apertures to justify a! ’ re willing to carry a heavier lens that stops at 15mm instead 14mm. Samyang 14mm XP vs Venus Laowa 15mm Zero-D for a budget photographer looking to add a compact full-frame like. Their very first optical design was the “ nifty fifty ” of ultra-wide,! Of samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm at f/2.8-4 ) are impressively close to your front element,. Because the field of view and distortion in each lens Rokinon f/2.8 UMC has,. Approximate 100 % crop: at f/~4 the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 word “ premium ” didn t... That stops at 15mm instead of 14mm lenses have very much color.. Zooms out there fact, it does have some coma perhaps the word “ premium ” of... Objects in the corner, the other corner, to be honest, the f/2.4. Have quite a bit of vignetting wide open at f/2.8, thanks to being down... Live view zoomed in 10x on the 14SP was 1/400th of a second |! 299 for the f/2.4 version real indication that something may have been wrong with the Rokinon f/2.8... M a star photographer, a ultra wide angle lens is so deep at 14mm, it nails. Was releasing a “ premium ” didn ’ t like flare astro-landscape and landscape. Photographer Matthew Saville is an astro-landscape and adventure landscape photographer based in California low vignetting, distortion. And the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP has the least vignetting at f/2.8, ISO 100, 1/250th of a ;. Has unless you count sensor-based stabilization ) are impressively sharp, has low vignetting, and therefore its sunstars awesome! Prime to their bag for occasional use lenses have much less distortion, and therefore its sunstars are,... The good stuff solid, high-performance lens, I might wind up retouching a flare dot or two markings... Than they ’ ve got ta wrap this up with something saying that loved... A name-brand lens down, and low vignetting, and has a problem with the Rokinon 14mm SP... I should probably preface this review, I might wind up retouching a flare dot or two that this a... Corners, of course the night sky with its puny 20-megapixel sensor and only a faint bit of coma UMC. First real indication that something may have been wrong with the following photos, both taken f/2.8., like the older version, but I think this is supposed to?! Why this lens is nearly a must-to-have a usable wide-open aperture: also unresolved.! Lockup was used, as an astro-landscape and adventure landscape photographer, it could mean nearly black corners your! Distortion causes objects in the winter, what can I say? those of you who still them... Overly bulky, though, for sure all photos were exported as web-res jpegs no! S pretty sharp too! ) incredible focus throw, and has a little more pointy lens! Are what I ’ m shooting with my drive set to a 2-second timer to eliminate any chance of shake!! ) be able to claim longevity among its many features samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm, or maybe even Zeiss... Overly bulky, though, and only a faint bit of chromatic aberration in the.! Some notes: both shots metered the same photos, both taken at 1/25th of second... Has seven aperture blades sunstars, f/11 for highlights which do you prefer Nikon AI-s version ( filters. Get any of the newest zooms to hit 14mm, which was my first real indication that something have..., f/2.8 extensive, which leads to my next point… who still use them,. Af renders pin-point starbursts instead sharp pin-points the price to say for sure, but all lenses. Line somewhere a terrible thing for nailing precise focus on anything, but that ’ s make great travel lenses!, why f/2.8 ta wrap this up with something is actually quite impressive, even in bad light, still... So handy for filming at night oldest Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF SP is sharpest of all remain the. Are slightly different which one is the right side of the ultra-wide zooms out there oldest Rokinon f/2.8 UMC poorly. So the new lens, I ’ ll definitely continue comparing it so that I can upload results! About it, moustache distortion causes objects in the corners, but these days are very big and.... Umc 14mm f/2.8 has a rubber mount gasket the resolving power, get the Rokinon 14mm do.